long term – Angil http://angil.org/ Tue, 12 Apr 2022 21:01:29 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 https://angil.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/icon-2021-06-29T195041.460-150x150.png long term – Angil http://angil.org/ 32 32 BlackRock BHK – CEF Rate-Focused Fixed Income (NYSE: BHK) https://angil.org/blackrock-bhk-cef-rate-focused-fixed-income-nyse-bhk/ Sat, 19 Mar 2022 09:46:39 +0000 https://angil.org/blackrock-bhk-cef-rate-focused-fixed-income-nyse-bhk/ Dilok Klaisataporn/iStock via Getty Images Thesis BlackRock Core Bond Trust (NYSE: BHK) is a closed-end, fixed-income fund whose primary objective is current income. The fund was launched in 2001 and seeks to achieve its primary objective by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of high quality bonds. Portfolio holdings may include corporate bonds, US government […]]]>

Dilok Klaisataporn/iStock via Getty Images

Thesis

BlackRock Core Bond Trust (NYSE: BHK) is a closed-end, fixed-income fund whose primary objective is current income. The fund was launched in 2001 and seeks to achieve its primary objective by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of high quality bonds. Portfolio holdings may include corporate bonds, US government and agency securities, and mortgage securities. At least 75% of its total assets will be invested in high quality bonds. Up to 25% of its total assets may be invested in bonds which are then rated Ba/BB or lower.

The vehicle currently has a high allocation to Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities (36%), investment grade bonds (24.9%) and high yield bonds (15%). Given its mandate and current portfolio structure, the fund is primarily driven by Fed rates and policy. We are currently in an incipient tightening cycle with market implied rate hikes for the rest of the year hovering above 6 following the Fed’s action yesterday. With 10-year rates currently trading around 2%, we can see a substantial upside depending on inflation readings and the Fed’s willingness to tackle it aggressively. The fund is down more than 20% since the start of the year due to its very high duration of 10.25 years and there is still room if rates indeed follow the path of 2018 when they peaked at around 3% (for the 10 annual returns).

BHK is a good long-term vehicle, however, with solid total returns that stand at 5.5% and 6.2% over a 5- and 10-year horizon. Returns were obtained with a Sharpe ratio of 0.61 and a standard deviation of 7.61 (both measured over a 5-year look-back period). We like this long term fund and think it is a solid buy and hold, but we are currently in the worst environment for this long term rates vehicle, namely an aggressive tightening cycle. With inflation creeping up and at historic highs, it’s unclear how far high rates will have to go to bring us back to a neutral inflationary environment. BHK should see more rate weakness and maybe even a bit more of the widening of the NAV discount. Although we like the long-term fund, we don’t think it’s prudent to stick with the name now and expect more weakness to come. We rate this name a To sell currently to be reviewed in the summer months when we should have more clarity on the Fed’s future actions.

Assets

The fund is currently overweight treasury bills and investment grade bonds:

BlackRock Core Bond Trust (<span class=

Top Sectors (Fund Fact Sheet)

We can see that treasury bills and agency mortgages make up over 36% of the portfolio, making the vehicle very sensitive to rate movements due to inflation, rate hike expectations and the possibility of a recession in the next few years.

Analysis of the ratings paints a similar picture:

BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) - credit rating distribution in %

Ratings (fund fact sheet)

Government and government equivalent securities fall into the AAA bracket, while the rest of the ratings analysis shows that the vast majority of the portfolio is investment grade.

The portfolio has a very high weighted average life and maturity profile:

BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) - maturity profile

Maturity Profile (Fund Fact Sheet)

We see that the tranche with the most assets is in the 20+ year segment, which explains the very high duration of the portfolio, which exceeds 10 years:

duration

Duration (Fund Fact Sheet)

Credit and market risk

As we observed in the Holdings section, the fund has very little credit risk, with only around 23% of its assets in below investment grade bonds. Moreover, half of this allocation is in the double BB tranche, which is the safest tranche of high yield credit. The main risks of this fund are market risk, and more specifically interest rate risk.

The fund has a very high duration of 10.25 years and has seen its net asset value and performance outlook plummet this year due to rising interest rates. The fund is down more than 21% from a price point of view this year and it could drop further depending on inflation performance and the Fed’s stance.

From a market risk perspective, there is also a small component of credit spread risk associated with the investment grade bond portfolio, where in a recessionary environment we may see those spreads widen, but this will be offset by the compression of the risk-free rates at time, and more than offset by the sheer compression of the yield on treasury bills and agency mortgages.

Performance

The fund is down more than 20% based on year-to-date prices:

BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) - price development chart

Price Movement (Seeking Alpha)

The increase in yields this year, and in particular 10-year rates, has weighed heavily on the fund since the start of the year. The fund has a very long duration and is driven by rate movements, and a Fed tightening environment is the worst type of market setup for this vehicle. If rates continue to rise, expect this fund to continue to lose value, both in terms of net asset value and market price.

Longer term, the picture is not bleak, with the fund showing stability and resilience in a rolling currency cycle setup:

BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) - 5 Year Price Return

5-Year Price Return (Seeking Alpha)

When you switch to a 5-year total return chart, we can clearly see how the dividend yield gives us that nice annual return of around 6% that we see on a 5-year basis:

BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) - 5 Year Total Return

5-year total return (seeking alpha)

Premium/Rebate to NAV

The fund typically trades at a discount to net asset value:

BlackRock Core Bond Trust (BHK) - Premium/Discount to Net Asset Value

Premium/Rebate to NAV (Morningstar)

We can see from the matrix above (where green indicates a discount and blue a premium to NAV) that the fund typically trades at a discount to NAV. 2021 was an outlier for the fund, when we saw a premium to net asset value thanks to a zero rate policy from the Fed and investors looking for yield. We are now back to a more normalized rate environment and the fund has already started trading at a discount to the net asset value, which could approach the extreme level of 8-9% if inflation does not subside. not and that investors continue to flee the duration and the fixed rate. cash assets.

Conclusion

BHK is a fixed income CEF focused on treasury bills and investment grade bonds. Yields on these asset classes are rate driven, and BHK does not disappoint with a high duration of over 10 years. Having lost more than 20% on a price basis in 2022 given rising 10-year yields, the vehicle is likely to weaken further as rates rise, as we saw in 2018 when 10-year yields peaked at 3%. This year has seen strong outflows from investment grade bond funds and this weakness in outflows is expected to continue. We expect a lower net asset value and lower BHK price over the next few months, due to higher yields that are far from their highs in this tightening environment. We rate this name a To sell currently to be reviewed in the summer months when we should have more clarity on the Fed’s future actions.

]]>
Liontrust Asset Management: How is the high yield market doing? https://angil.org/liontrust-asset-management-how-is-the-high-yield-market-doing/ Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:40:13 +0000 https://angil.org/liontrust-asset-management-how-is-the-high-yield-market-doing/ There is a lot to unpack in this question. The short answer is, pretty good. The major stock indices are, as I say, still reeling, with the strong-growing Eurostoxx and Nasdaq both down 15% year-to-date. The global high yield market is down nearly 6.3% year-to-date in sterling terms. Digging deeper, the US market is down […]]]>

There is a lot to unpack in this question. The short answer is, pretty good.

The major stock indices are, as I say, still reeling, with the strong-growing Eurostoxx and Nasdaq both down 15% year-to-date. The global high yield market is down nearly 6.3% year-to-date in sterling terms. Digging deeper, the US market is down 4.8%, while European high yield is down 5.8%. Given the proximity of the conflict and Europe’s dependence on Russian raw materials, this difference is not surprising.

Indeed, the US high yield market remains far more concerned about rising interest rates and duration risk than overall demand in the economy and the potential for increased defaults. An illustration of this point is the continued outperformance of low-quality CCC bonds. High yield market commentators have argued for months, if not years, that CCC bonds are a good place to hide from rising interest rates. The high coupons on offer are naturally more resilient to rising interest rates than the lower coupons you typically get from, for example, BB-rated bonds.

Of course, with commodity prices exploding, the large cohort of commodity sector bonds in the CCC-rated US portion of the market are benefiting. With fixed and limited bond upside, especially when the market has already largely priced in their current good fortune, we don’t think this is a theme that bond investors should embrace too easily. We should always keep in mind the default bias towards the lower quality segments of the market, illustrated in Chart 1 below. If an investor wants to bet on thematic and cyclical companies, it is best to do so in the stock market.

There is no such outperformance of CCCs in Europe, where the specter of stagflation is arguably greater. Stagflation is when you have both inflation and a declining economy. Inflation was already proving desperately persistent before the commodity price boom and will, of course, be exacerbated if commodity prices remain high. Meanwhile, European manufacturing and discretionary consumer spending will likely both be hit. The inflation part of this problem means that central bankers will be reluctant to reduce monetary policy as they normally do in a downturn.

To a large extent, these fears carry over to European high yield spreads, the risk premium we are paid for the risk of default that accompanies high yield bonds. The European high yield spread – as shown in Chart 2 – has now risen to 4.8%, well above the long-term average of 4.1%, and we see this as an attractive risk offset. .

Note that US high yield spreads are still below the long-term average, but with the number of interest rate hikes embedded in US government bonds, the overall return is in line with the long-term average. Therefore, we also like the US high yield, especially considering the likely resilience of the US in the face of a continued escalation in Ukraine. In our view, there is much less risk of a default spike in the US.

Our high yield exposure is currently split evenly between the US and Europe (including the UK). We have low exposure to cyclical stocks and companies with high energy production costs. We don’t have any airlines, which are so exposed to fuel costs. The quality bias we have in our process means that we are very light on CCC risk and have no noticeable risk in emerging markets. Additionally, our quality bias means we also look for companies with pricing power and resilience, two operational qualities that are the best defense in tougher economic times. With these features, our high yield holdings have an average gross redemption yield of approximately 6.7%.

Some may counter that if you’re optimistic about defaults, as we are, why not own more CCC and increase your yield? The main reason we are generally optimistic about defaults is that a small proportion of global high yield debt is due in the short term: 7% in 2022 and 16% in 2022 and 2023 combined, as shown in the Chart 3. Although, if you’re old enough, you’ll remember that the high yield market closed to new issues for 18 months during the global financial crisis! To be clear, we don’t believe this event will cause such a level of tension in the market. Looking at Chart 1, we still believe that a quality bias is the best way to approach the high yield market over the long term.

Many customers ask about liquidity. The honest answer is that in times like this, liquidity is more difficult when trying to access an offer. Often the selling price is lower than what is shown on our Bloomberg screens (and therefore factored into market prices). We often see more liquid large corporate bonds indicating greater volatility than parts of the market with, in our view, higher risk of default.

During longer periods of market stress, this price dynamic tends to play out and the lower quality and less liquid segments of the market catch up in terms of market price. Our “big, liquid, listed” mantra means that we expect to be less affected than many during such times.

The corollary is that longer periods of market stress create opportunities for valuation, as the compensation for future defaults – the spread – often overreacts. We don’t think this time is any different.

For a full list of common financial words and terms, see our glossary here.

Main risks

Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. You may get back less than you originally invested. The issue of units/shares of Liontrust Funds may be subject to entry charges, which will have an impact on the realizable value of the investment, particularly in the short term. Investments should always be considered long term. Investments in funds managed by the Global Fixed Income team involve foreign currencies and may be subject to fluctuations in value due to fluctuations in exchange rates. The value of fixed income securities will fall if the issuer is unable to repay its debt or has its credit rating reduced. Generally, the higher the perceived credit risk of the issuer, the higher the interest rate. Bond markets may be subject to reduced liquidity. The Sub-Funds may invest in emerging markets/weak currencies which may have the effect of increasing volatility. Certain Funds may invest in derivatives. The use of derivatives may create leverage or leverage. A relatively small movement in the value of the underlying investment of a derivative instrument may have a greater impact, positive or negative, on the value of a fund than if the underlying investment were held instead. .

Warning

This is a commercial communication. Before making an investment, you should read the relevant Prospectus and Key Investor Information Document (KIID), which provide full details of the product, including investment costs and risks. These documents can be obtained free of charge at www.liontrust.eu or directly from Liontrust. Always research your own investments. If you are not a professional investor, please consult a regulated financial adviser regarding the suitability of such an investment for you and your personal circumstances.

This should not be construed as investment advice in any product or security mentioned, an offer to buy or sell units/shares of the Funds mentioned, or a solicitation to buy securities in any company or investment product. Examples of stocks are provided for general information only to demonstrate our investment philosophy. The promoted investment relates to the units of a fund, and not directly to the underlying assets. It contains information and analyzes believed to be accurate at the time of publication, but subject to change without notice. Although care has been taken in compiling the contents of this document, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by Liontrust as to its accuracy or completeness, including to external sources (which may have been used) which have not been verified. It shall not be copied, transmitted, reproduced, disclosed or otherwise distributed in any form by fax, e-mail, oral or otherwise, in whole or in part without the express prior written consent of Liontrust. Always research your own investments and if you are not a professional investor, please consult a regulated financial adviser regarding the suitability of such an investment for you and your personal circumstances.

Friday, March 11, 2022, 1:19 PM

]]>
Austin venture capital firm seeks to back Texas-based startups with $250 million in hand https://angil.org/austin-venture-capital-firm-seeks-to-back-texas-based-startups-with-250-million-in-hand/ Wed, 09 Mar 2022 14:02:22 +0000 https://angil.org/austin-venture-capital-firm-seeks-to-back-texas-based-startups-with-250-million-in-hand/ An Austin-based venture capital firm has raised $250 million from investors for its seventh growth capital fund targeting Texas startups. S3 Ventures has focused on early-stage business technologies, digital experiences and health technology companies in Dallas, Austin, Houston and San Antonio since its inception in 2005. The company’s founder is also its managing partner – […]]]>

An Austin-based venture capital firm has raised $250 million from investors for its seventh growth capital fund targeting Texas startups.

S3 Ventures has focused on early-stage business technologies, digital experiences and health technology companies in Dallas, Austin, Houston and San Antonio since its inception in 2005. The company’s founder is also its managing partner – Brian Smith, who founded Austin. Crossroads Systems in 1994 and led it through five investment rounds and an initial public offering.

In Dallas, the firm’s previous investments included fast-growing digital banking company Alkami Technology. Charlie Plauche, general partner of S3 Ventures, said Alkami was the company’s most successful holding company. In 2021, Alkami went public with a valuation of over $3 billion.

S3 Ventures has also backed NoiseAware, an automated noise monitoring provider, and IFM Restoration, an online marketplace that connects contractors with owners of single-family rental homes.

Smith said he likes what he sees in Texas.

“(Texas has people) who live and work here and entrepreneurs who come here and build great businesses here,” Smith said. “We see the attractiveness of this growing.”

S3 Ventures has made over 50 investments to date, with over 25 active portfolio companies and over 20 exits. The company’s portfolio companies have raised nearly $2 billion in total funding.

The company invests between $500,000 and $10 million in early growth cycles, with the ability to invest over $20 million over the life cycle of a business. Its assets under management total over $900 million.

“We believe that by 2030, Texas could be the nation’s second-largest tech ecosystem,” Smith said in a statement. “This growth is being driven by long-term demographic shifts and widespread economic strength.”

Siemens Group USA generated $17 billion in revenue in fiscal 2020 as a key...
Local companies

Siemens Invests $10 Million in Grand Prairie Hub as Semiconductor Manufacturing Sets to Boom

Siemens will invest $10 million to expand its Grand Prairie manufacturing center as part of a broader campaign to capitalize on semiconductor fabs being built in the United States. The German company’s investment in Texas, along with additional spending at its California production hub, will help fuel projects like Intel Corp.’s announcement of new chip factories. for Arizona and Ohio. In total, Siemens plans to invest $54 million in its US facilities and create 300 new jobs.

]]>
Some investors may be concerned about Baikowski’s capital returns (EPA:ALBKK) https://angil.org/some-investors-may-be-concerned-about-baikowskis-capital-returns-epaalbkk/ Wed, 09 Mar 2022 05:59:52 +0000 https://angil.org/some-investors-may-be-concerned-about-baikowskis-capital-returns-epaalbkk/ Did you know that there are financial metrics that can provide clues to a potential multi-bagger? Typically, we will want to notice a growth trend to return to on capital employed (ROCE) and at the same time, a based capital employed. This shows us that it is a compounding machine, capable of continuously reinvesting its […]]]>

Did you know that there are financial metrics that can provide clues to a potential multi-bagger? Typically, we will want to notice a growth trend to return to on capital employed (ROCE) and at the same time, a based capital employed. This shows us that it is a compounding machine, capable of continuously reinvesting its profits back into the business and generating higher returns. In light of this, when we looked Baikowski (EPA:ALBKK) and its ROCE trend, we weren’t exactly thrilled.

Return on capital employed (ROCE): what is it?

If you’ve never worked with ROCE before, it measures the “yield” (pre-tax profit) a company generates from the capital used in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Baikowski:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets – Current Liabilities)

0.094 = €4.6m ÷ (€67m – €18m) (Based on the last twelve months to June 2021).

Thereby, Baikowski has a ROCE of 9.4%. In absolute terms, this is a low yield, but it is far better than the chemical industry average of 7.8%.

See our latest analysis for Baikowski

ENXTPA: ALBKK Return on Capital Employed March 9, 2022

Although the past is not indicative of the future, it can be useful to know the historical performance of a company, which is why we have this graph above. If you want to see how Baikowski has performed in the past in other metrics, you can see this free chart of past profits, revenue and cash flow.

So what is Baikowski’s ROCE trend?

When we looked at the ROCE trend at Baikowski, we didn’t gain much confidence. Over the past four years, capital returns have declined to 9.4% from 13% four years ago. However, it looks like Baikowski could reinvest for long-term growth because while capital employed has increased, the company’s sales haven’t changed much over the past 12 months. It’s worth keeping an eye on the company’s earnings going forward to see if those investments end up contributing to the bottom line.

The essential

In summary, Baikowski is reinvesting funds into the business for growth, but unfortunately, it appears sales haven’t grown much yet. Considering the stock has gained an impressive 29% over the past three years, investors must be thinking there are better things to come. But if the trajectory of these underlying trends continues, we think the likelihood of it being a multi-bagger from here is not high.

One last note, you should inquire about the 3 warning signs we spotted some with Baikowski (including 1 which is a bit unpleasant).

For those who like to invest in solid companies, look at this free list of companies with strong balance sheets and high returns on equity.

This Simply Wall St article is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell stocks and does not take into account your objectives or financial situation. Our goal is to bring you targeted long-term analysis based on fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not take into account the latest announcements from price-sensitive companies or qualitative materials. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

]]>
The commodity boom has arrived. How to invest with funds. https://angil.org/the-commodity-boom-has-arrived-how-to-invest-with-funds/ Fri, 04 Mar 2022 13:27:00 +0000 https://angil.org/the-commodity-boom-has-arrived-how-to-invest-with-funds/ Global supply chain constraints have led to global shortages, abnormal weather is hurting crop yields in key agricultural regions and inflation has made real assets like commodities an attractive hedge against currency devaluation . The global effort to decarbonize the economy could be another long-term tailwind. Industrial metals like lithium and cobalt are seeing new […]]]>

Global supply chain constraints have led to global shortages, abnormal weather is hurting crop yields in key agricultural regions and inflation has made real assets like commodities an attractive hedge against currency devaluation .

The global effort to decarbonize the economy could be another long-term tailwind. Industrial metals like lithium and cobalt are seeing new demand as the world builds green infrastructure and more electric cars. Investments in fossil fuels are declining, but renewable sources are not yet ready to take their place.

Energy prices are likely to remain high, while supplies of industrial metals and agricultural products, both of which require large amounts of energy to produce, are likely to decline.

“This domino effect is doing the rounds of the entire commodities landscape right now,” says Jason Bloom, head of fixed income and alternative ETF product strategy at Invesco.

If you don’t own commodities due to their lagging performance over the past decade, it might be time to reconsider. “Commodity cycles tend to be longer in nature,” says Ed Egilinsky, head of alternative investments at Direxion. “We are still in the early innings of a supercycle.”

Unless you are prepared to trade commodity futures, mutual funds and exchange-traded funds are the most convenient way to invest in this asset class. Year-to-date, US commodity funds have generated an average return of 17%, while stocks and bonds are down. Commodity ETFs alone have seen nearly $9 billion in net asset inflows this year, according to FactSet.

Fund / Symbol AUM (millions) Expense ratio 1 year return 3 year return
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 / PDBC $7,472 0.68%* 54.1% 17.9%
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy / FTGC 3,462 0.95 40.1 17.2
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy / GCC 300 0.55 34.3 N / A
Pimco CommodityRealReturn Strategy / PCRAX 8,249 1.44 46.7 19.2

Note: Data as of March 2. *The fund has a fee of 0.59% until at least August 31, 2022; N/A=not applicable; the three-year return is annualized.

Source: Morning Star

Choosing a commodity fund can be difficult. Some bet on a particular commodity, while diversified portfolios could dampen volatility and reduce risk. But there is a wide variation in what they hold and in how much. Investors must choose carefully.

Largest commodity index ETF, $7.5 billion


Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1

(ticker: PDBC), holds more than half of its holdings in energy futures such as oil and natural gas, with the rest of its weighting split between metals and agricultural commodities. It worked well over the past year as energy prices soared. The fund has gained 55% in the past 12 months, beating 90% of its peers, according to Morningstar.

But some investors might want a more diversified basket instead of a proxy for energy, says Blair duQuesnay, investment adviser at Ritholtz Wealth Management. Commodities are often used to diversify a portfolio due to their low correlation with stocks and bonds. A fund heavily weighted in energy does not necessarily offer such advantages, she notes.

This is why actively managed commodity funds often reduce their exposure to energy and look for opportunities elsewhere. The $3.5 billion


First Trust Global Tactical Commodities Strategy

ETF (FTGC) has less than a third of its assets in energy and holds nickel and platinum futures. The $8.2 billion


Pimco CommodityRealReturn Strategy

(PCRAX) invests in carbon credits created by cap and trade programs in California and Europe.

The $300 million


WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy

ETF (GCC) even added a 3% position in Bitcoin futures last year, the first US ETF to do so. “Bitcoin, with its fixed supply, competes as a next-generation store of value like gold,” says Jeremy Schwartz, global chief investment officer at WisdomTree.

Mutual funds often charge higher fees than ETFs or have high sales charges. The Pimco fund, for example, has an expense ratio of 1.44% and an entry fee of 5.5% for investments below $50,000. ETF Invesco only charges 0.68%, while ETF First Trust and WisdomTree charge 0.95% and 0.55% respectively and charge no fees.

When buying commodity funds, investors should look for those that maximize “rolling yield” – the cost or benefit when expiring futures contracts are replaced by longer dated contracts. If a commodity is in contango, meaning the futures prices are above the spot price, rolling the contracts would cost money. Conversely, if the commodity is in backwardation, meaning the spot price is higher than the futures, it would generate positive returns.

While some funds automatically roll over their contracts to the first month on a fixed date, others aim to minimize costs and maximize returns by contracting with the lightest contango or largest offset at the best possible time. This means that these funds can hold contracts further down the curve than futures, which tend to be less volatile but deviate further from spot prices.

Over the past decade, thanks to falling spot prices and the constant contango of many commodities, contract turnover has cost the Bloomberg Commodities Index more than 7% annually, Schwartz says.

Today, spot prices are rising, contract rollovers are generating returns, and even the collateral used for futures positions – typically Treasury bills or short-term commercial paper – could start to generate higher returns. high as the Federal Reserve raises interest rates. “We are clearly seeing the reversal of a very long trend of poor commodity performance,” duQuesnay said.

Yet commodities can become very volatile, even with their long-term tailwinds. “Commodities are always vulnerable to economic and demand shocks,” Bloom says. “If you get another variant of Covid-19 that brings the economy to a halt again, or if the Fed overdoes the rate hikes and drags the economy into a recession, that would be very negative for commodity prices.”

Investors must be prepared to overcome obstacles.

Write to Evie Liu at evie.liu@barrons.com

]]>
Sachem Capital Corp. Price Listed Public Offer of https://angil.org/sachem-capital-corp-price-listed-public-offer-of/ Thu, 03 Mar 2022 23:31:39 +0000 https://angil.org/sachem-capital-corp-price-listed-public-offer-of/ BRANFORD, Conn., March 03, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Sachem Capital Corp. (NYSE American: SACH) Announces the Pricing of a Registered Public Offering of $50.0 Million Aggregate Principal Amount of 6.00% Unsecured and Unsubordinated Notes Due Five Years from the Date issue (“Notes”). The net proceeds of the offering to Sachem Capital Corp. is expected to […]]]>

BRANFORD, Conn., March 03, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Sachem Capital Corp. (NYSE American: SACH) Announces the Pricing of a Registered Public Offering of $50.0 Million Aggregate Principal Amount of 6.00% Unsecured and Unsubordinated Notes Due Five Years from the Date issue (“Notes”). The net proceeds of the offering to Sachem Capital Corp. is expected to be approximately $48.2 million after payment of underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering costs payable by Sachem Capital Corp.

The offering is expected to close on March 9, 2022, subject to customary closing conditions. Sachem Capital Corp. granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional aggregate principal amount of $7.5 million of notes to cover over-allotments, if any.

Notes will be graded past bet with all unsecured and unsubordinated debt of the company, whether currently outstanding or issued in the future. The Notes are expected to list on the NYSE American under the symbol “SCCE” and begin trading on or about March 10, 2022.

The Notes will mature on March 30, 2027 and may be redeemed, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, at the Company’s option beginning on March 9, 2024. Interest on the Notes will accrue at the rate annual rate of 6.00% and will be payable quarterly, in arrears, on March 30, June 30, September 30 and December 30 during which the Notes are outstanding, commencing on June 30, 2022.

The Notes have a private credit rating of BBB+ assigned by Egan-Jones Ratings Company, an independent, unaffiliated rating agency. Egan-Jones is a nationally recognized statistical rating organization and is recognized by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as a credit rating provider. Egan-Jones is also certified by the European Securities and Markets Authority. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time.

Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, InspereX LLC and William Blair & Company, LLC are acting as joint bookrunners for the offering. Colliers Securities LLC is acting as co-manager of the offering.

This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy the securities of this offer or any other securities, nor will there be any sale of the Notes or any other securities. mentioned in this press release in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such state or jurisdiction.

A registration statement relating to, among other things, the Notes has been filed with and declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The offering is being made only by means of a related prospectus supplement and an accompanying base prospectus forming part of the effective registration statement, copies of which may be obtained, when available, from from: Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. upon written request to Syndicate Department, 640 5th Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10019 (telephone number 1-800-573-2541) or by sending e-mail to prospectus @ladenburg.com; Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, by written request to 1717 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 (phone number 1-800-526-6397) or by emailing prospectus@janney.com; or InspereX LLC, Attn: Syndicate Department, 200 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 3400, Chicago, IL 60606 (phone number 1-800-327-1546) or by emailing prospectus_requests@insperex.com; or William Blair & Company, LLC upon written request to 150 North Riverside Plaza, Chicago, Illinois 60606 (phone number 1-800-621-0687) or by emailing prospectus@williamblair.com. Copies may also be obtained free of charge by visiting EDGAR on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

Sachem Capital Corp. has filed a preliminary prospectus supplement, dated March 3, 2022, with the Securities and Exchange Commission which contains a more detailed description of the Notes and the terms of the offering. The preliminary prospectus supplement, dated March 3, 2022, and the accompanying base prospectus, dated February 25, 2022, which contain other important information about Sachem Capital Corp., should be read carefully before investing in the tickets. Investors are urged to carefully consider their personal investment objectives, the risks relating to Sachem Capital Corp., generally, and the Notes in particular, and other matters relating to Sachem Capital Corp., its business, operations and its financial situation, before investing in the notes.

About Sachem Capital Corp.

Sachem Capital Corp. specializes in the origination, underwriting, financing, servicing and management of a portfolio of first mortgage loans. It offers short-term (i.e. three years or less) secured non-bank loans (sometimes referred to as “hard money” loans) to property investors to finance the acquisition, renovation, development, rehabilitation or improvement of properties located primarily in Connecticut. . The company does not lend to owner occupiers. The company’s primary underwriting criteria is a conservative loan-to-value ratio. The properties securing the Company’s loans are generally classified as residential or commercial real estate and are generally held for the purpose of resale or investment. Each loan is secured by a first ranking mortgage on real estate. Each loan is also personally guaranteed by the principal(s) of the borrower, which security may be secured as security by a pledge of the guarantor’s interest in the borrower. The company also makes opportunistic real estate purchases outside of its lending business. The company believes that it qualifies as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for federal income tax purposes and has elected to be taxed as a REIT beginning with its 2017 tax year.

Forward-looking statements

This press release may contain forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this press release, including statements regarding our future operating results and financial condition, our strategy and plans, and our expectations for future operations, are statements prospective. The words “anticipate”, “estimate”, “expect”, “project”, “plan”, “seek”, “intend”, “believe”, “may”, “might”, ” will”, “should”, “could”, “likely”, “continue”, “design” and the negative form of these terms and other similar words and phrases are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections regarding future events and trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, strategy, operations and business objectives in the near and future. long term and our financial needs. These forward-looking statements are subject to several risks, uncertainties and assumptions, as described in our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2021. Due to these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this press release may not occur, and actual results may differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied by the forward-looking statements.

You should not rely on forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, level of activity, performance or achievements. Further, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of such forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these and other cautionary statements made in this press release. You should evaluate all forward-looking statements made by us in the context of these risks and uncertainties.

Investor and media contact:
Crescendo Communications, LLC
Email: sach@crescendo-ir.com
Tel: (212) 671-1021

]]>
INTERFACE INC MANAGEMENT REPORT AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Form 10-K) https://angil.org/interface-inc-management-report-and-analysis-of-financial-position-and-results-of-operations-form-10-k/ Wed, 02 Mar 2022 21:26:10 +0000 https://angil.org/interface-inc-management-report-and-analysis-of-financial-position-and-results-of-operations-form-10-k/ Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic On March 1, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic, and the virus continues to spread in areas where we operate and sell our products and services. The COVID-19 pandemic has had material adverse effects on our business, results of operations, and financial condition, and it […]]]>

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic


On March 1, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a
pandemic, and the virus continues to spread in areas where we operate and sell
our products and services. The COVID-19 pandemic has had material adverse
effects on our business, results of operations, and financial condition, and it
is anticipated that this will continue for an indefinite period of time. The
duration of the pandemic will ultimately determine the extent to which our
operations are impacted. We continue to monitor our operations and have
implemented various programs to mitigate the effects on our business including
reductions in employees, labor costs, marketing expenses, consulting expenses,
travel costs, various other costs, and capital expenditures, as well as reducing
the amount of the cash dividend that we pay on our common stock. We continue to
focus on the impact COVID-19 has on our employees in accordance with the
Company's ongoing safety measures, as well as any local government orders and
"shelter in place" directives in place from time to time.

During fiscal year 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic had less of an impact on our
overall financial results as consolidated net sales increased 8.8% compared to
fiscal year 2020. Government stimulus programs, increased COVID-19 vaccination
rates, and fewer COVID-19 related restrictions in some places contributed to a
rebound in economic activity in certain countries driving higher revenues
globally compared to fiscal year 2020. The sales increase in fiscal year 2021
compared to fiscal year 2020 was primarily in non-corporate office market
segments, including healthcare, education, retail, residential / living and
transportation. Our global supply chain and manufacturing operations, however,
experienced increased adverse impacts and disruptions in 2021 from COVID-19.
These impacts included raw material shortages, raw material cost increases,
higher freight costs, shipping delays, and labor shortages - particularly in the
United States. These impacts to our supply chain and manufacturing operations
increased our costs, decreased our ability to achieve manufacturing targets,
increased lead times to our customers, and adversely affected our gross profit
margin as a percentage of net sales. Management believes it is reasonably likely
these impacts will continue and affect our future operations and results to some
degree, particularly during the first half of 2022.

During fiscal year 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in 17.9% lower
consolidated net sales compared to fiscal year 2019. We temporarily suspended
production in certain manufacturing facilities in 2020 due to government
lockdowns, shelter in place orders and reduced demand. Our sales mix shifted
towards more non-corporate office market segments as the COVID-19 pandemic
reduced corporate spending, which impacted sales in the corporate office market.
During 2020, the Company recorded $12.9 million of voluntary and involuntary
severance costs, which were included in selling, general and administrative
expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

In fiscal year 2020, government grants and payroll protection programs were
available in various countries globally to provide assistance to companies
impacted by the pandemic. The CARES Act enacted in the United States (see Note
17 entitled "Income Taxes" included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
for additional information) and a payroll protection program enacted in the
Netherlands (the "NOW Program") provided benefits related to payroll costs
either as reimbursements, lower payroll tax rates or deferral of payroll tax
payments. The NOW Program provided eligible companies with reimbursement of
labor costs as an incentive to retain employees and continue paying them in
accordance with the Company's customary compensation practices. During fiscal
year 2020, the Company qualified for benefits under several payroll protection
programs and recognized a reduction in payroll costs of approximately $7.3
million, which were recorded as a $6.1 million reduction of selling, general and
administrative expenses and a $1.2 million reduction of cost of sales in the
consolidated statements of operations, as the Company believes it is probable
that the benefits received will not be repaid.

During the first quarter of 2020, as a result of changes in macroeconomic
conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, we recognized a charge of $121.3
million for the impairment of goodwill and certain intangible assets. See Note
12 entitled "Goodwill and Intangible Assets" of Part II, Item 8 of this Annual
Report for additional information.

Executive Overview


Our revenues are derived from sales of floorcovering products, primarily modular
carpet, luxury vinyl tile ("LVT") and rubber flooring products. Our business, as
well as the commercial interiors industry in general, is cyclical in nature and
is impacted by economic conditions and trends that affect the markets for
commercial and institutional business space. The commercial interiors industry,
including the market for floorcovering products, is largely driven by
reinvestment by corporations into their existing businesses in the form of new
fixtures and furnishings for their workplaces. In significant part, the timing
and amount of such reinvestments are impacted by the profitability of those
corporations. As a result, macroeconomic factors such as employment rates,
office vacancy rates, capital spending, productivity and efficiency gains that
impact corporate profitability in general, also affect our business.
                                       25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tab    le     of Contents
During fiscal year 2021, the Company largely completed its integration of the
nora acquisition, and integration of its European and Asia-Pacific commercial
areas and determined that it has two operating and reportable segments - namely
Americas ("AMS") and Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia (collectively "EAAA").
The AMS operating segment is unchanged from prior year and continues to include
the United States, Canada and Latin America geographic areas. See Note 20
entitled "Segment Information" included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K for additional information. The results of operations discussion below also
includes segment information.

We focus our marketing and sales efforts on both corporate office and
non-corporate office market segments, to reduce somewhat our exposure to
economic cycles that affect the corporate office market segment more adversely,
as well as to capture additional market share. More than half of our
consolidated net sales were in non-corporate office markets in fiscal year 2021
and fiscal year 2020, primarily in education, healthcare, government, retail,
and residential/living market segments. See Item 1, "Business" of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our mix of modular
carpet and resilient flooring sales in corporate office verses non-corporate
office market segments for the last three fiscal years by reportable segment.

During 2021, we had consolidated net sales of $1,200.4 million, up 8.8% compared
to $1,103.3 million in 2020, primarily due to the rebound in economic activity
in certain countries following the impacts of COVID-19. Consolidated operating
income for 2021 was $104.8 million compared to consolidated operating loss of
$39.3 million in 2020 primarily due to higher sales in 2021 and a $121.3 million
impairment of goodwill and certain intangible assets in 2020. Fiscal year 2021
also included $3.9 million of restructuring charges in connection with the
planned closure of our Thailand manufacturing operations anticipated to occur in
2022. Consolidated net income for 2021 was $55.2 million or $0.94 per share,
compared to consolidated net loss of $71.9 million, or $1.23 per share, in 2020.

During 2020, we had consolidated net sales of $1,103.3 million, down 17.9%
compared to $1,343.0 million in 2019, primarily due to the impacts of COVID-19.
The consolidated operating loss for 2020 was $39.3 million compared to
consolidated operating income of $130.9 million in 2019, due primarily to a
$121.3 million goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge recorded in
fiscal 2020 due to the impacts of COVID-19. The consolidated net loss for 2020
was $71.9 million, or $1.23 per share, compared to consolidated net income of
$79.2 million, or $1.34 per share, in 2019.

A detailed analysis of our consolidated and segment performance for 2021 and 2020 is set out below under the heading “Analysis of operating results”.

                                       26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tab    le     of Contents
Analysis of Results of Operations

Consolidated results

The following discussion and analyzes reflect the factors and trends discussed in previous sections.


Consolidated net sales denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar were
approximately 50% in 2021, 51% in 2020, and 49% in 2019. Because we have
substantial international operations, we are impacted, from time to time, by
international developments that affect foreign currency transactions. In 2021,
the strengthening of the Euro, Australian dollar, Chinese Renminbi and British
Pound sterling against the U.S. dollar had a positive impact on our net sales
and operating income. In 2020, the strengthening of the Euro, British Pound
sterling, and Chinese Renminbi against the U.S. dollar had a positive impact on
our net sales and operating income. In 2019, the weakening of the Euro, British
Pound sterling, Australian dollar, Canadian dollar and Chinese Renminbi against
the U.S. dollar had a negative impact on our net sales and operating income.

The following table shows the amounts (in we dollars) by which the exchange rates for converting Euros, British Pounds Sterling, Australian Dollars, Chinese Renminbi and Canadian Dollars into we dollars have affected our consolidated net sales and operating profit or loss over the past three years:


                                                      2021                   2020                   2019
                                                                        (in 

millions)

Impact of changes in foreign currency on
consolidated net sales                          $        23.9          $         7.1          $       (26.2)
Impact of changes in foreign currency on
consolidated operating income (loss)                      3.2                    0.9                   (3.9)



The following table presents, as a percentage of net sales, certain items
included in our consolidated statements of operations during the past three
years:

                                                                 Fiscal Year
                                                       2021          2020         2019
Net sales                                              100.0  %     100.0  %     100.0  %
Cost of sales                                           64.0         62.8         60.3
Gross profit on sales                                   36.0         37.2         39.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses            27.0         30.2   

29.0

Restructuring, impairment of assets and other charges 0.3 (0.4)

1.0

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge            -         11.0            -
Operating income (loss)                                  8.7         (3.6)         9.7
Interest/Other expense                                   2.7          3.6          2.2
Income (loss) before income tax expense                  6.0         (7.2)         7.5
Income tax expense (benefit)                             1.4         (0.7)         1.7
Net income (loss)                                        4.6  %      (6.5) %       5.8  %



Consolidated Net Sales

Below we provide information regarding our consolidated net sales and analyze
those results for each of the last three fiscal years. Fiscal year 2021 included
52 weeks, fiscal year 2020 included 53 weeks, and fiscal year 2019 included 52
weeks.

                                                          Fiscal Year                                            Percentage Change
                                         2021                 2020                 2019             2021 compared with        2020 compared with
                                                         (in thousands)                                    2020                      2019
Consolidated net sales              $ 1,200,398          $ 1,103,262          $ 1,343,029                        8.8  %                  (17.9) %



                                       27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tab    le     of Contents
Consolidated net sales for 2021 compared with 2020

For 2021, our consolidated net sales increased $97.1 million (8.8%) compared to
2020, comprised of higher sales volumes (approximately 5.1%) and higher prices
(approximately 3.7%). Fluctuations in currency exchange rates had a positive
impact on our year-over-year consolidated sales comparison of approximately
$23.9 million, meaning that if currency levels had remained constant year over
year our 2021 sales would have been lower by this amount. On a market segment
basis, the sales increase was most significant in non-corporate office market
segments including retail, education and healthcare. See the segment results
discussion below for additional information on market segments.

Consolidated turnover 2020 compared to 2019


For 2020, our consolidated net sales decreased $239.8 million (17.9%) compared
to 2019, primarily due to the impacts of COVID-19 resulting in lower sales
volumes globally. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates had a positive impact
on our year-over-year sales comparison of approximately $7.1 million, meaning
that if currency levels had remained constant year over year, our 2020 sales
would have been lower by this amount. On a market segment basis, the decrease in
consolidated net sales was primarily in the corporate office, retail,
hospitality and healthcare market segments. See the segment results discussion
below for additional information on market segments.

Consolidated costs and expenses

The following table shows our consolidated cost of sales and selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses over the past three years:

                                                         Fiscal Year                                            Percentage Change
                                          2021               2020               2019              2021 compared                2020 compared
                                                        (in thousands)                              with 2020                    with 2019
Consolidated cost of sales            $ 767,665          $ 692,688          $ 810,062                       10.8  %                       (14.5) %
Consolidated selling, general and
administrative expenses                 324,315            333,229            389,117                       (2.7) %                       (14.4) %



For 2021, our consolidated costs of sales increased $75.0 million (10.8%)
compared to 2020, primarily due to higher net sales and the continued adverse
impacts of COVID-19. Currency translation had a $16.2 million (2.3%) negative
impact on the year-over-year comparison. In 2021, the impact of COVID-19
continued to challenge our global supply chain which contributed to higher cost
of sales and lower gross profit margins - particularly in the United States. As
a percentage of net sales, our consolidated costs of sales increased to 64.0% in
2021 versus 62.8% in 2020, primarily due to inflationary pressures on raw
materials, freight and labor costs driving an approximately 3.4% increase in
cost of sales as a percentage of net sales compared to the prior year. The
increase in our consolidated cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was
partially offset by productivity efficiencies during the year. Management
believes it is reasonably likely the inflationary pressures experienced in 2021
will continue to some degree in 2022, particularly in the first half of 2022.

For 2020, our consolidated costs of sales decreased $117.4 million (14.5%)
compared with 2019, primarily due to lower net sales. Currency translation had a
$4.7 million (0.6%) negative impact on the year-over-year comparison. As a
percentage of net sales, our consolidated costs of sales increased to 62.8% in
2020 versus 60.3% in 2019, primarily due to changes in fixed cost absorption
driven by lower production volumes due to the impacts of COVID-19.

For 2021, our consolidated SG&A expenses decreased $8.9 million (2.7%) versus
2020. Currency translation had a $5.3 million (1.6%) negative impact on the
year-over-year comparison. Consolidated SG&A expenses were lower in 2021
primarily due to (1) lower legal fees and other related costs of $12.6 million
primarily due to the settlement of the SEC matter in the prior year period, and
(2) lower severance costs of $9.1 million as the prior year included additional
cost reduction initiatives implemented in response to COVID-19 as discussed
above. These decreases were partially offset by higher labor costs of
approximately $11.0 million due to higher performance-based compensation as
target performance measures were achieved in 2021, partially offset by cost
savings from prior year headcount reduction initiatives. As a percentage of net
sales, SG&A expenses decreased to 27.0% in 2021 versus 30.2% in 2020.




                                       28
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tab    le     of Contents
For 2020, our consolidated SG&A expenses decreased $55.9 million (14.4%) versus
2019. Currency translation had a $1.5 million (0.4%) negative impact on the
year-over-year comparison. Consolidated SG&A expenses were lower in 2020
primarily due to (1) lower selling expenses of $54.8 million due to lower net
sales, (2) $7.3 million of payroll expense credits related to COVID-19 wage
support government assistance programs, and (3) $9.2 million lower
performance-based compensation due to stock compensation forfeitures and target
performance measures not being met due to COVID-19. These reductions were
partially offset by $12.9 million of severance expenses due to voluntary and
involuntary separations, and a $5.0 million fine to settle the SEC matter as
referenced in Item 8 Note 18 - "Commitments and Contingencies". As a percentage
of sales, SG&A expenses increased to 30.2% in 2020 versus 29.0% in 2019,
primarily due to lower net sales.

Restructuring plans


On September 8, 2021, the Company committed to a new restructuring plan that
continues to focus on efforts to improve efficiencies and decrease costs across
its worldwide operations. The plan involves a reduction of approximately 188
employees and the closure of the Company's carpet tile manufacturing facility in
Thailand, anticipated to occur at the end of the first quarter of 2022. As a
result of this plan, the Company expects to incur pre-tax restructuring charges
between the third quarter of 2021 and the fourth quarter of 2022 of
approximately $4 million to $5 million. The expected charges are comprised of
severance expenses ($2.2 million), retention bonuses ($0.5 million), and asset
impairment and other charges ($2.0 million). The costs of retention bonuses of
approximately $0.5 million will be recognized through the end of fiscal year
2022 as earned over the requisite service periods. Restructuring charges of
$3.9 million comprised of severance and asset impairment charges were recognized
during the third quarter of 2021.

The Thailand plant closure is expected to result in future cash expenditures of
approximately $3 million to $4 million for payment of the employee severance and
employee retention bonuses and other costs of the shutdown of the Thailand
manufacturing facility, as described above. The Company expects to complete the
restructuring plan in fiscal year 2022 and expects the plan to yield annualized
savings of approximately $1.7 million. A portion of the annualized savings is
expected to be realized on the consolidated statement of operations in fiscal
year 2022, with the remaining portion of the annualized savings expected to be
realized in fiscal year 2023.

On December 23, 2019, the Company committed to a new restructuring plan to
improve efficiencies and decrease costs across its worldwide operations, and
more closely align its operating structure with its business strategy. The plan
involved a reduction of approximately 105 employees and early termination of two
office leases. As a result of this plan, the Company recorded a pre-tax
restructuring charge in the fourth quarter of 2019 of approximately $9.0
million. The charge was comprised of severance expenses ($8.8 million) and lease
exit costs ($0.2 million). The restructuring charge was expected to result in
future cash expenditures of approximately $9.0 million for payment of these
employee severance and lease exit costs. The Company expected the plan to yield
annualized savings of approximately $6.0 million. A portion of the annualized
savings was realized on the consolidated statement of operations in fiscal year
2020, with the remaining portion of the annualized savings realized in fiscal
year 2021.

On December 29, 2018, the Company committed to a new restructuring plan in its
continuing efforts to improve efficiencies and decrease costs across its
worldwide operations, and more closely align its operating structure with its
business strategy. The plan involved (i) a restructuring of its sales and
administrative operations in the United Kingdom, (ii) a reduction of
approximately 200 employees, primarily in the Europe and Asia-Pacific geographic
regions, and (iii) the write-down of certain underutilized and impaired assets
that included information technology assets and obsolete manufacturing
equipment. The restructuring plan was completed at the end of fiscal year 2020.

Good willImpairment of intangible assets and fixed assets


During 2021, we recognized a fixed asset impairment charge of $4.4 million for
projects that were abandoned. During 2020, we recognized a charge of $121.3
million for the impairment of goodwill and certain intangible assets. See Note
12 entitled "Goodwill and Intangible Assets" of Part II, Item 8 of this Annual
Report for additional information. During 2020, we also recognized fixed asset
impairment charges of $5.0 million primarily related to certain FLOR design
center closures and other projects that were abandoned or indefinitely delayed.
These charges are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in
the consolidated statements of operations.


                                       29

————————————————– ——————————

Contents

Interest charges


For 2021, our interest expense increased $0.5 million to $29.7 million, versus
$29.2 million in 2020, primarily due to (1) higher fixed-rate interest expense
on the Senior Notes debt, which replaced variable-rate debt under the Syndicated
Credit Facility, and (2) $4.9 million of deferred losses recognized on
terminated interest rate swaps that were reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss into interest expense during the year. These increases were
partially offset by $60 million of lower outstanding borrowings under the
Syndicated Credit Facility compared to 2020. Our average borrowing rate under
the Syndicated Credit Facility was 1.91% for 2021 compared to 1.89% in 2020.

 For 2020, our interest expense increased $3.6 million to $29.2 million, versus
$25.6 million in 2019, primarily due to (1) a $3.6 million loss on
extinguishment of debt to amend the Syndicated Credit Facility and repay a
portion of outstanding indebtedness thereunder, and (2) a $3.9 million
reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive loss for deferred interest
rate swap losses due to the termination of interest rate swap contracts. These
increases were partially offset by lower average interest rates on our
borrowings under the Syndicated Credit Facility (our average borrowing rate for
2020 was 1.89% compared to 3.27% in 2019) and lower outstanding borrowings under
the Syndicated Credit Facility compared to 2019.

Other expenses


Other expenses decreased $8.4 million during fiscal year 2021 compared to 2020,
primarily due to a $4.2 million write-down of damaged raw material inventory in
2020, which resulted from a fire at a leased storage facility.

Tax


For the year ended January 2, 2022, the Company recorded income tax expense of
$17.4 million on pre-tax income of $72.6 million resulting in an effective tax
rate of 24.0%, as compared to an income tax benefit of $7.5 million on pre-tax
loss of $79.4 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 9.4% for the year
ended January 3, 2021. The effective tax rate for the year ended January 3, 2021
was significantly impacted by a non-deductible goodwill impairment charge and
recognition of income tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken in
prior years on discontinued operations. Excluding the impact of the
non-deductible goodwill impairment charge and recognition of income tax benefits
related to uncertain tax positions on discontinued operations, the effective tax
rate was 14.1% for the year ended January 3, 2021. The increase in the effective
tax rate for the year ended January 2, 2022 as compared to the year ended
January 3, 2021 was primarily due to the one-time favorable impacts of amending
prior year tax returns during the period ended January 3, 2021, an increase in
non-deductible employee compensation and an increase in the valuation allowance
on net operating loss and interest carryforwards. This increase was partially
offset by a decrease in non-deductible business expenses.

For the year ended January 3, 2021, the Company recorded an income tax benefit
of $7.5 million on pre-tax loss of $79.4 million resulting in an effective tax
rate of 9.4%. The effective tax rate for this period was significantly impacted
by a non-deductible goodwill impairment charge and recognition of income tax
benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken in prior years on discontinued
operations. Excluding the impact of the non-deductible goodwill impairment
charge and recognition of income tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions
on discontinued operations, the effective tax rate was 14.1% for 2020 compared
to 22.2% in 2019. The decrease in the effective tax rate, excluding the goodwill
impairment charge and recognition of income tax benefits related to uncertain
tax positions on discontinued operations, was primarily due to the favorable
impacts of amending prior year tax returns, retroactive election of the GILTI
High-tax Exclusion in the 2019 tax return and reduction in non-deductible
employee compensation. This decrease was partially offset by the non-deductible
SEC fine.

Segment Results

As discussed above, in fiscal year 2021 the Company determined that it has two
operating and reportable segments - AMS and EAAA. Segment information presented
below for fiscal years 2020 and 2019 have been restated to conform to the new
reportable segment structure. See Note 20 entitled "Segment Information"
included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional
information.


                                       30

————————————————– ——————————

Contents

SMA segment – Net sales and adjusted operating income (“AOI”)


The following table presents AMS segment net sales and AOI for the last three
fiscal years:

                                                        Fiscal Year                                         Percentage Change
                                         2021               2020               2019            2021 compared with        2020 compared with
                                                       (in thousands)                                 2020                      2019
AMS segment net sales                $ 651,216          $ 593,418          $ 757,112                        9.7  %                  (21.6) %
AMS segment AOI(1)                      85,014             89,097            120,921                       (4.6) %                  (26.3) %


(1) Includes allocation of corporate SG&A expenses. Excludes non-recurring items
related to intangible asset impairment charges, restructuring, asset impairment,
severance and other costs. See Note 20 entitled "Segment Information" included
in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

AMS segment revenue in 2021 vs. 2020


During 2021, net sales in AMS increased 9.7% versus 2020, comprised of higher
sales volumes and higher prices. On a market segment basis, the AMS sales
increase was most significant in non-corporate office market segments including
healthcare (up 19.1%), retail (up 19.1%) and education (up 18.3%). Sales in the
corporate office market increased 6.8% in 2021 compared to 2020. These increases
were partially offset by decreases in the hospitality (down 38.3%) and public
buildings (down 20%) market segments.

AMS segment revenue in 2020 compared to 2019


During 2020, net sales in AMS decreased 21.6% versus the comparable period in
2019. The AMS sales decrease in 2020 was due primarily to the impacts of
COVID-19 and lower carpet tile sales volumes. On a market segment basis, the
sales decrease in the Americas was most significant in the corporate office
(down 33.8%), retail (down 34.8%), healthcare (down 15.2%) and education (down
8.3%) market segments, partially offset by increases in the residential living
(up 23.8%) and public buildings (up 8.2%) market segments.

AMS AOI for 2021 vs. 2020


AOI in AMS decreased 4.6% during 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher
cost of sales as a result of inflationary pressures on raw materials, freight
and labor costs driving an approximately 3.0% increase in cost of sales as a
percentage of net sales compared to the prior year. The increase in cost of
sales as a percentage of net sales was partially offset by productivity
efficiencies during the year. AOI as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2021
decreased to 13.1% compared to 15.0% in 2020 due to the global supply chain
pressures discussed above.

AMS AOI for 2020 vs. 2019


AOI in AMS decreased 26.3% during 2020 compared to 2019 primarily due to the
impacts of COVID-19 which resulted in lower sales volumes in 2020. The decrease
in AOI was also partially due to costs related to the closure of the FLOR stores
in 2020.

EAAA segment – Net sales and area of ​​interest


The following table presents EAAA segment net sales and AOI for the last three
fiscal years:

                                                          Fiscal Year                                         Percentage Change
                                           2021               2020               2019            2021 compared with        2020 compared with
                                                         (in thousands)                                 2020                      2019
EAAA segment net sales                 $ 549,182          $ 509,844          $ 585,917                        7.7  %                  (13.0) %
EAAA segment AOI(1)                       37,268             21,403             28,832                       74.1  %                  (25.8) %


(1) Includes allocation of corporate SG&A expenses. Excludes non-recurring items
related to goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges, purchase accounting
amortization, restructuring, asset impairment, severance and other costs. See
Note 20 entitled "Segment Information" included in Item 8 of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K for additional information.


                                       31

————————————————– ——————————

Contents

EAAA segment revenue in 2021 compared to 2020


During 2021, net sales in EAAA increased 7.7% versus 2020, comprised of higher
sales volumes and higher prices. Currency fluctuations had an approximately
$21.5 million (4.2%) positive impact on EAAA's 2021 sales compared to 2020 due
to the strengthening of the Euro, British Pound sterling, Australian dollar and
the Chinese Renminbi against the U.S. dollar. On a market segment basis, the
EAAA sales increase was most significant in non-corporate office market segments
including retail (up 53.8%), public buildings (up 30.2%) and healthcare (up
19.0%). Sales in the corporate office market increased 2.4% in 2021 compared to
2020. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the education (down
2.6%) market segment.

EAAA segment revenue in 2020 compared to 2019


During 2020, net sales in EAAA decreased 13.0% versus 2019, due primarily to the
impacts of COVID-19 and lower carpet tile sales volumes. Currency fluctuations
had an approximately $7.3 million (1.3%) positive impact on EAAA's fiscal year
2020 sales compared with 2019, due primarily to the strengthening of the Euro
and British Pound sterling against the U.S. dollar. On a market segment basis,
the EAAA sales decrease was most significant in the hospitality (down 40.3%),
corporate office (down 19.1%), public buildings (down 16.0%) and retail (down
12.9%) market segments.

AOI EAAA for 2021 vs. 2020


AOI in EAAA increased 74.1% during 2021 versus 2020. Currency fluctuations had
an approximately $3.1 million (6.4%) positive impact on AOI for 2021. SG&A
expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to 23.0% in 2021 compared to
24.6% in 2020 due to savings from cost reduction initiatives implemented in the
prior year. AOI as a percentage of net sales increased to 6.8% in 2021 compared
to 4.2% in 2020, due primarily to higher sales as discussed above.

AOI EAAA for 2020 vs. 2019

AOI in EAAA decreased by 25.8% in 2020 compared to 2019, mainly due to the impacts of COVID-19 which led to lower sales volumes in 2020. Currency fluctuations impacted of about $0.9 million (1.4%) positive impact on AOI for 2020.

Cash and capital resources

General


In our business, we require cash and other liquid assets primarily to purchase
raw materials and to pay other manufacturing costs, in addition to funding
normal course SG&A expenses, anticipated capital expenditures, interest expense
and potential special projects. We generate our cash and other liquidity
requirements primarily from our operations and from borrowings or letters of
credit under our Syndicated Credit Facility and Senior Notes discussed below. We
anticipate that our liquidity is sufficient to meet our obligations for the next
12 months and we expect to generate sufficient cash to meet our long-term
obligations.

Below is a summary of our significant cash requirements for future periods:

                                                                                       Payments Due by Period
                                         Total Payments          Less than                                                More than
                                              Due                  1 year           1-3 years          3-5 years           5 years
                                                                               (in thousands)
Long-term debt obligations             $       525,131          $  15,002   

$30,004 $180,125 $300,000
Operating lease obligations and financing

                                    130,820             19,802             28,625             21,726             60,667
Expected interest payments                     132,949             21,941             42,756             35,252             33,000
Purchase obligations                            17,787             16,531              1,193                 63                  -
Pension cash obligations                        33,917              5,970              5,973              6,211             15,763
Total                                  $       840,604          $  79,246          $ 108,551          $ 243,377          $ 409,430




                                       32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tab    le     of Contents
Historically, we use more cash in the first half of the fiscal year, as we pay
insurance premiums, taxes and incentive compensation and build up inventory in
preparation for the holiday/vacation season of our international operations. As
outlined in the table above, we have approximately $79.2 million in material
contractual cash obligations due by the end of fiscal year 2022, which includes,
among other things, scheduled debt repayments under the Syndicated Credit
Facility, pension contributions, interest payments on our debt and lease
commitments. Our long-term debt obligations include the contractually scheduled
principal repayment of our term loan borrowings under the Syndicated Credit
Facility, which matures in 2025, and $300 million on our Senior Notes due in
2028. Operating and finance lease obligations consist of undiscounted lease
payments due over the term of the lease. Expected interest payments are those
associated with borrowings under the Syndicated Credit Facility and Senior Notes
consistent with our contractually scheduled principal repayments. Our purchase
obligations are for non-cancellable agreements primarily for raw material
purchases and capital expenditures. Our current and long-term pension
obligations include contributions and expected benefit payments to be paid by
the Company related to certain defined benefit pension plans and excludes the
expected benefit payments for two of our funded foreign defined benefit plans as
these obligations will be paid by the plans over the next ten years.

Based on current interest rates and debt levels, we expect our aggregate
interest expense for 2022 to be between $27 million and $28 million. We estimate
aggregate capital expenditures in 2022 to be approximately $30 million, although
we are not committed to these amounts.

Liquidity


At January 2, 2022, we had $97.3 million in cash. Approximately $1.7 million of
this cash was located in the U.S., and the remaining $95.6 million was located
outside of the U.S. The cash located outside of the U.S. is indefinitely
reinvested in the respective jurisdictions (except as identified below). We
believe that our strategic plans and business needs, particularly for working
capital needs and capital expenditure requirements in Europe, Asia, and
Australia, support our assertion that a portion of our cash in foreign locations
will be reinvested and remittance will be postponed indefinitely. Of the $95.6
million of cash in foreign jurisdictions, approximately $12.9 million represents
earnings which we have determined are not permanently reinvested, and as such we
have provided for foreign withholding and U.S. state income taxes on these
amounts in accordance with applicable accounting standards.

As of January 2, 2022, we had $225.1 million of borrowings outstanding under our
Syndicated Credit Facility, of which $217.6 million were term loan borrowings
and $7.5 million were revolving loan borrowings. Additionally, $1.6 million in
letters of credit were outstanding under the Syndicated Credit Facility at the
end of fiscal year 2021. As of January 2, 2022, we had additional borrowing
capacity of $290.9 million under the Syndicated Credit Facility and $6.0 million
of additional borrowing capacity under our other credit facilities in place at
other non-U.S. subsidiaries.

On November 17, 2020, we issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of 5.50%
Senior Notes due 2028 (the "Senior Notes"), which are discussed further below.
As of January 2, 2022, we had $300.0 million of Senior Notes outstanding.

 It is important for you to consider that we have a significant amount of
indebtedness. Our Syndicated Credit Facility matures in November of 2025 and the
Senior Notes, as discussed below, mature in December 2028. We cannot assure you
that we will be able to renegotiate or refinance any of our debt on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all. If we are unable to refinance our debt or obtain
new financing, we would have to consider other options, such as selling assets
to meet our debt service obligations and other liquidity needs, or using cash,
if available, that would have been used for other business purposes.

It is also important for you to consider that borrowings under our Syndicated
Credit Facility comprise a substantial portion of our indebtedness, and that
these borrowings are based on variable interest rates (as described below) that
expose the Company to the risk that short-term interest rates may increase.
During 2020, we entered into fixed rate Senior Notes (as described below) which
reduced the amount of indebtedness subject to interest rate risk. In the fourth
quarter of 2020, we terminated our interest rate swaps that were previously
being used to fix a portion of our variable rate debt. For information regarding
the current variable interest rates of these borrowings, the potential impact on
our interest expense from hypothetical increases in short term interest rates,
and the interest rate swap transaction, please see the discussion in Item 7A of
this Report.

We are not party to any material off-balance sheet arrangements.

                                       33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tab    le     of Contents
Analysis of Cash Flows

The following table presents a summary of cash flows for fiscal years 2021, 2020
and 2019:

                                                                 Fiscal Year
                                                      2021          2020           2019
                                                                (in thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities                               $ 86,689      $ 119,070      $ 141,768
Investing activities                                (28,071)       (61,689)       (74,222)
Financing activities                                (60,858)       (42,715)       (66,677)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash              (3,561)         7,086  

(557)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents              (5,801)        21,752  

312

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 103,053 81,301

80,989

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period $97,252 $103,053

$81,301

We ended 2021 with $97.3 million in cash, a decrease of $5.8 million during the year. The decrease is mainly explained by the following items:


•Cash provided by operating activities was $86.7 million for 2021, which
represents a decrease of $32.4 million compared to 2020. The decrease was
primarily due to a greater use of cash for working capital during 2021.
Specifically, higher accounts receivable and inventories primarily attributable
to increased customer demand in 2021 were partially offset by increases in
accounts payable and accrued expenses that contributed positively to the change
in working capital. Lower variable compensation payouts in 2021 related to 2020
performance had a positive impact on cash provided by operating activities,
partially offsetting the decrease from changes in working capital.

•Cash used in investing activities was $28.1 million for 2021, which represents
a decrease of $33.6 million from 2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower
capital expenditures compared to 2020 as two major capital projects were
substantially completed in the prior year.

•Cash used in financing activities was $60.9 million for 2021, which represents
an increase of $18.1 million compared to 2020. In 2021, we repaid approximately
$60 million in term loan borrowings which contributed to the increase in cash
used in financing activities (compared with 2020, when repayments on term loan
borrowings were largely funded with the proceeds from the issuance of the $300
million Senior Notes).

We ended 2020 with $103.1 million in cash, an increase of $21.8 million during the year. The increase is mainly explained by the following items:


•Cash provided by operating activities was $119.1 million for 2020, which
represents a decrease of $22.7 million compared to 2019. The decrease was
primarily due to lower net income due to the impacts of COVID-19, offset by
working capital sources of cash, specifically a decrease in accounts receivable
of $40.1 million, lower inventories of $38.7 million and lower prepaid and other
expenses of $13.0 million. These sources of cash were offset by a $60.9 million
use of cash in accounts payable and accrued expenses to fund normal operations.

•Cash used in investing activities was $61.7 million for 2020, which represents
a decrease of $12.5 million from 2019. The decrease was primarily due to lower
capital expenditures compared to 2019 due to fewer project demands and lower
capital investment as a result of the impacts of COVID-19.

•Cash used in financing activities was $42.7 million for 2020, which represents
a decrease of $24.0 million compared to 2019. Financing activities for 2020
include higher loan borrowings of $320.0 million primarily due to the issuance
of $300 million of Senior Notes, offset by (1) higher repayments of revolving
and term loan borrowings as the proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes
were used to repay $290.7 million of outstanding term and revolving loan
borrowings under the Syndicated Credit Facility, and (2) a decrease in dividends
paid of $9.8 million.


                                       34
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tab    le     of Contents
We ended 2019 with $81.3 million in cash, an increase of $0.3 million during the
year. The most significant uses of cash in 2019 were (1) repayments on our
Syndicated Credit Facility of $111.7 million offset by borrowings of $90
million, (2) capital expenditures of $74.6 million, (3) $25.2 million to
repurchase 1.6 million shares of the Company's outstanding common stock, and (3)
dividend payments of $15.4 million. These uses were offset by cash flow from
operations of $141.8 million, primarily generated from (1) net income of $79.2
million, (2) $19.4 million for increases in accounts payable and accrued
expenses, and (3) $2.6 million due to a decrease in inventories. These sources
of cash were reduced by working capital uses of (1) $9.7 million due to
increases in prepaid expenses, and (2) $0.9 million due to increases in accounts
receivable.

We believe that our liquidity position will provide sufficient funds to meet our current commitments and our other cash requirements for the foreseeable future.

Syndicated credit facility


In the normal course of business, in addition to using our available cash, we
fund our operations by borrowing under our Syndicated Credit Facility (the
"Facility"). At January 2, 2022, the Facility provided the Company and certain
of its subsidiaries with a multicurrency revolving loan facility up to $300
million, as well as other U.S. denominated and multicurrency term
loans. Material terms under the Facility are discussed below. For additional
information please see Note 9 entitled "Long-Term Debt" in Item 8 of this
Report.

Interest Rates and Fees


Under the Facility, interest on base rate loans is charged at varying rates
computed by applying a margin ranging from 0.25% to 2.00%, depending on the
Company's consolidated net leverage ratio (as defined in the Facility agreement)
as of the most recently completed fiscal quarter. Interest on Eurocurrency-based
loans and fees for letters of credit are charged at varying rates computed by
applying a margin ranging from 1.25% to 3.00% over the applicable Eurocurrency
rate, depending on the Company's consolidated net leverage ratio as of the most
recently completed fiscal quarter. In addition, the Company pays a commitment
fee ranging from 0.20% to 0.40% per annum (depending on the Company's
consolidated net leverage ratio as of the most recently completed fiscal
quarter) on the unused portion of the Facility.

LIBOR Transition


The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA"), which regulates the London
interbank offered rate ("LIBOR"), announced that the FCA will no longer persuade
or compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. This
announcement indicated that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis was
not guaranteed after 2021, and LIBOR may be discontinued or modified.
Additionally, certain U.S. dollar LIBOR rates will be discontinued by June 2023.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing the Secured Overnight
Financing Rate ("SOFR") in April 2018 as an alternative for LIBOR. SOFR is a
broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by U.S.
Treasury securities. We have exposure to LIBOR-based financial instruments under
the Facility, which has variable (or floating) interest rates based on LIBOR.
The Facility allows for the use of an alternative benchmark rate if LIBOR is no
longer available.

On December 9, 2021, we entered into the fourth amendment to the Facility to
replace the LIBOR interest rate benchmark applicable to loans and other
extensions of credit under the Facility denominated in British Pounds sterling
and Euros with specified successor benchmark rates, to amend certain provisions
related to the implementation, use and administration of successor benchmark
rates, and to set forth certain borrowing requirements in the event LIBOR and
other successor rates become unavailable.

pacts


The Facility contains standard and customary covenants for agreements of this
type, including various reporting, affirmative and negative covenants. Among
other things, these covenants limit our ability to:

•create or incur liens on assets;
•make acquisitions of or investments in businesses (in excess of certain
specified amounts);
•engage in any material line of business substantially different from the
Company's current lines of business;
•incur indebtedness or contingent obligations;
•sell or dispose of assets (in excess of certain specified amounts);
•pay dividends or repurchase our stock (in excess of certain specified amounts);
•repay other indebtedness prior to maturity unless we meet certain conditions;
and
•enter into sale and leaseback transactions.
                                       35

————————————————– ——————————

Table of Contents The facility also requires us to comply with the following financial covenants at the end of each fiscal quarter, based on our consolidated results for the year then ended:

• Consolidated net secured leverage ratio: must not exceed 3.00:1.00. • Consolidated interest coverage ratio: must not be less than 2.25:1.00.

Event of default


If we breach or fail to perform any of the affirmative or negative covenants
under the Facility, or if other specified events occur (such as a bankruptcy or
similar event or a change of control of Interface, Inc. or certain subsidiaries,
or if we breach or fail to perform any covenant or agreement contained in any
instrument relating to any of our other indebtedness exceeding $20 million),
after giving effect to any applicable notice and right to cure provisions, an
event of default will exist. If an event of default exists and is continuing,
the lenders' Administrative Agent may, and upon the written request of a
specified percentage of the lender group shall:

•declare all commitments of the lenders under the facility terminated;
•declare all amounts outstanding or accrued thereunder immediately due and
payable; and
•exercise other rights and remedies available to them under the agreement and
applicable law.

Collateral

Pursuant to a Second Amended and Restated Security and Pledge Agreement, the
Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of Interface, Inc. and
our domestic subsidiaries (subject to exceptions for certain immaterial
subsidiaries), including all of the stock of our domestic subsidiaries and up to
65% of the stock of our first-tier material foreign subsidiaries. If an event of
default occurs under the Facility, the lenders' Administrative Agent may, upon
the request of a specified percentage of lenders, exercise remedies with respect
to the collateral, including, in some instances, foreclosing mortgages on real
estate assets, taking possession of or selling personal property assets,
collecting accounts receivables, or exercising proxies to take control of the
pledged stock of domestic and first-tier material foreign subsidiaries.

 As of January 2, 2022, we had outstanding $217.6 million of term loan borrowing
and $7.5 million of revolving loan borrowings under the Facility, and had $1.6
million in letters of credit outstanding under the Facility. As of January 2,
2022, the weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the
Facility was 1.91%.

Under the Facility, we are required to make quarterly amortization payments of
the term loan borrowings. The amortization payments are due on the last day of
the calendar quarter.

We are currently in compliance with all of the covenants under the facility and expect that we will continue to be in compliance with the covenants for the foreseeable future.


In the fourth quarter of 2020, we terminated our interest rate swaps and paid
approximately $13 million to terminate the swap agreements. For additional
information on interest rates, please see Item 7A and Note 9 entitled "Long-Term
Debt" in Item 8 of this Report.

Senior Notes


On November 17, 2020, the Company issued $300 million aggregate principal amount
of 5.50% Senior Notes due 2028. The Senior Notes bear an interest rate at 5.50%
per annum and mature on December 1, 2028. Interest is paid semi-annually on June
1 and December 1 of each year, beginning on June 1, 2021. The Company used the
net proceeds to repay $269.7 million of outstanding term loan borrowings and
$21.0 million of outstanding revolving loan borrowings under the Facility. In
connection with the issuance of the Senior Notes, the Company recorded $5.7
million of debt issuance costs. These debt issuance costs were recorded as a
reduction of long-term debt in the consolidated balance sheets and will be
amortized over the life of the outstanding debt.


                                       36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tab    le     of Contents
The Senior Notes are unsecured and are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by
each of the Company's material domestic subsidiaries, all of which also
guarantee the obligations of the Company under its existing Facility. The
Company's foreign subsidiaries and certain non-material domestic subsidiaries
are considered non-guarantors. Net sales for the non-guarantor subsidiaries were
approximately $594 million for fiscal year 2021 and $548 million for fiscal year
2020. Total indebtedness of the non-guarantor subsidiaries was approximately $45
million as of January 2, 2022, and $88 million as of January 3, 2021. The Senior
Notes can be redeemed on or after December 1, 2023, at specified redemption
prices. See Note 9 entitled "Long-Term Debt" in Item 8 of this report for
additional information.

Forward-looking statement on the impact of COVID-19


While we are aggressively managing our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, its
impacts on our full fiscal year 2022 results and beyond are uncertain. We
believe the most significant elements of uncertainty are (1) the intensity and
duration of the impact on construction, renovation, and remodeling; (2)
corporate, government, and consumer spending levels and sentiment; (3) the
ability of our sales channels, supply chain, manufacturing, and distribution
partners to continue operating through disruptions; and (4) the severity of
global supply chain disruptions and their effects on inflation, labor shortages,
raw material shortages, and other factors that disrupt our supply chain and
manufacturing facilities. Any or all of these factors could negatively impact
our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and outlook. As the
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect companies with global
operations, specifically as it relates to the global supply chain, we anticipate
that, at a minimum, our business and results in the first half of 2022 will
continue to be affected, and the timeline and pace of recovery is uncertain.

Cash flows from operations, cash and cash equivalents, and other sources of
liquidity are expected to be available and sufficient to meet foreseeable cash
requirements. However, the Company's cash flows from operations can be affected
by numerous factors including the uncertainty of COVID-19 and its impact on
global operations, raw material availability and cost, demand for our products,
and other factors described in "Risk Factors" included in Part I, Item 1A of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                       37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tab    le     of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The policies and estimates discussed below are considered by management to be
critical to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements because
their application places the most significant demands on management's judgment,
with financial reporting results relying on estimations about the effects of
matters that are inherently uncertain. Specific risks for these critical
accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs. For all of these
policies, management cautions that future events may not develop as forecasted,
and the best estimates routinely require adjustment.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment
at the asset group level whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected
future undiscounted cash flow is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an
impairment is indicated. A loss is then recognized for the difference, if any,
between the fair value of the asset (as estimated by management using its best
judgment) and the carrying value of the asset. Management's judgement in
estimating the undiscounted cash flows based on market conditions and trends,
and other industry specific metrics used in determining the fair value is
subject to uncertainty. If actual market value is less favorable than that
estimated by management, additional write-downs may be required.

Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities. The carrying values of deferred
income tax assets and liabilities reflect the application of our income tax
accounting policies in accordance with applicable accounting standards and are
based on management's assumptions and estimates regarding future operating
results and levels of taxable income, as well as management's judgment regarding
the interpretation of the provisions of applicable accounting standards. The
carrying values of liabilities for income taxes currently payable are based on
management's interpretations of applicable tax laws and incorporate management's
assumptions and judgments regarding the use of tax planning strategies in
various taxing jurisdictions. The use of different estimates, assumptions and
judgments in connection with accounting for income taxes may result in
materially different carrying values of income tax assets and liabilities and
results of operations.

We evaluate the recoverability of these deferred tax assets by assessing the
adequacy of future expected taxable income from all sources, including reversal
of taxable temporary differences, forecasted operating earnings and available
tax planning strategies. These sources of income inherently rely heavily on
estimates. We use our historical experience and our short and long-term business
forecasts to provide insight. Further, our global business portfolio gives us
the opportunity to employ various prudent and feasible tax planning strategies
to facilitate the recoverability of future deductions. To the extent we do not
consider it more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be recovered, a
valuation allowance is established. As of January 2, 2022, and January 3, 2021,
we had state net operating loss carryforwards of $153.0 million and $142.7
million, respectively. Certain of these state net operating loss carryforwards
are reserved with a valuation allowance because, based on the available
evidence, we believe it is more likely than not that we would not be able to
utilize those deferred tax assets in the future. The remaining year-end 2021
amounts are expected to be fully recoverable within the applicable statutory
expiration periods. If the actual amounts of taxable income differ from our
estimates, the amount of our valuation allowance could be materially impacted.

Goodwill. Prior to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-04
"Intangibles-Goodwill and Other", we tested goodwill for impairment at least
annually using a two-step approach. In the first step of this approach, we
prepared valuations of reporting units, using both a market comparable approach
and an income approach, and those valuations were compared with the respective
book values of the reporting units to determine whether any goodwill impairment
existed. In preparing the valuations, past, present and expected future
performance was considered. If impairment was indicated in this first step of
the test, a step two valuation approach was performed. The step two valuation
approach compared the implied fair value of goodwill to the book value of
goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill was determined by allocating the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the assets and liabilities of the
reporting unit, including both recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, in
the same manner as goodwill is determined in a business combination under
applicable accounting standards. After completion of this step two test, a loss
was recognized for the difference, if any, between the fair value of the
goodwill associated with the reporting unit and the book value of that goodwill.

 On December 30, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2017-04, "Intangibles - Goodwill
and Other," that provides for the elimination of Step 2 from the goodwill
impairment test described above. Under the new guidance, impairment charges are
recognized to the extent the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its
fair value with certain limitations.


                                       38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tab    le     of Contents
In accordance with applicable accounting standards, the Company tests goodwill
for impairment annually and between annual tests if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a
reporting unit below its carrying amount. Management's assessment of whether a
triggering event has occurred and the development of any forecasts to be used in
the fair value determination are subject to judgement. During the fourth
quarters of 2021, 2020 and 2019, we performed the annual goodwill impairment
test. We perform this test at the reporting unit level. For our reporting units
which carried a goodwill balance as of January 2, 2022, no impairment of
goodwill was indicated. As of January 2, 2022, if our estimates of the fair
value of our reporting units were 10% lower, we believe no additional goodwill
impairment would have existed. However, the full extent of the future impact of
COVID-19 on the Company's operations is uncertain, and a prolonged COVID-19
pandemic could result in additional impairment of goodwill. If the actual fair
value of the goodwill is determined to be less than that estimated, an
additional write-down may be required.

Inventories. We determine the value of inventories using the lower of cost or
net realizable value. We write down inventories for the difference between the
carrying value of the inventories and their net realizable value. If actual
market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management,
additional write-downs may be required.

Management's judgement in estimating our reserves for inventory obsolescence is
based on continuous examination of our inventories to determine if there are
indicators that carrying values exceed net realizable values. Experience has
shown that significant indicators that could require the need for additional
inventory write-downs are the age of the inventory, the length of its product
life cycles, anticipated demand for our products and current economic
conditions. While we believe that adequate write-downs for inventory
obsolescence have been made in the consolidated financial statements, consumer
tastes and preferences will continue to change and we could experience
additional inventory write-downs in the future. Our inventory reserve on
January 2, 2022 and January 3, 2021, was $27.1 million and $35.0 million,
respectively. To the extent that actual obsolescence of our inventory differs
from our estimate by 10%, our 2021 net income would be higher or lower by
approximately $2.1 million, on an after-tax basis.

Pension Benefits. Net pension expense recorded is based on, among other things,
assumptions about the discount rate, estimated return on plan assets and salary
increases. While management believes these assumptions are reasonable, changes
in these and other factors and differences between actual and assumed changes in
the present value of liabilities or assets of our plans above certain thresholds
could cause net annual expense to increase or decrease materially from year to
year. The actuarial assumptions used in our salary continuation plan and our
foreign defined benefit plans reporting are reviewed periodically and compared
with external benchmarks to ensure that they appropriately account for our
future pension benefit obligation. The expected long-term rate of return on plan
assets assumption is based on weighted average expected returns for each asset
class. Expected returns reflect a combination of historical performance analysis
and the forward-looking views of the financial markets, and include input from
actuaries, investment service firms and investment managers. The table below
represents the changes to the projected benefit obligation as a result of
changes in discount rate assumptions:

                                                                       Increase (Decrease) in
                                                                         Projected Benefit
Foreign Defined Benefit Plans                                                Obligation
                                                                           (in millions)
1% increase in actuarial assumption for discount rate                  $    

(47.1)

1% decrease in actuarial assumption for discount rate                                 60.2



                                                                        Increase (Decrease) in
                                                                           Projected Benefit
Domestic Salary Continuation Plan                                           

Obligation

                                                                             (in millions)
1% increase in actuarial assumption for discount rate                   $               (3.0)
1% decrease in actuarial assumption for discount rate                                    3.6




                                       39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tab    le     of Contents
Allowances for Expected Credit Losses. We maintain allowances for expected
credit losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required
payments. Estimating the amount of future expected losses requires us to
consider historical losses from our customers, as well as current market
conditions and future forecasts of our customers' ability to make payments for
goods and services. By its nature, such an estimate is highly subjective, and it
is possible that the amount of accounts receivable that we are unable to collect
may be different than the amount initially estimated. Our allowance for expected
credit losses on January 2, 2022 and January 3, 2021, was $5.0 million and $6.6
million, respectively. To the extent the actual collectability of our accounts
receivable differs from our estimates by 10%, our 2021 net income would be
higher or lower by approximately $0.4 million, on an after-tax basis, depending
on whether the actual collectability was better or worse, respectively, than the
estimated allowance.

Product Warranties. We typically provide limited warranties with respect to
certain attributes of our carpet products (for example, warranties regarding
excessive surface wear, edge ravel and static electricity) for periods ranging
from ten to twenty years, depending on the particular carpet product and the
environment in which the product is to be installed. Similar limited warranties
are provided on certain attributes of our rubber and LVT products, typically for
a period of 5 to 15 years. We typically warrant that any services performed will
be free from defects in workmanship for a period of one year following
completion. In the event of a breach of warranty, the remedy typically is
limited to repair of the problem or replacement of the affected product. We
record a provision related to warranty costs based on historical experience and
future expectations and periodically adjust these provisions to reflect changes
in actual experience. Our warranty and sales allowance reserve on January 2,
2022 and January 3, 2021, was $2.7 million and $3.2 million, respectively.
Actual warranty expense incurred could vary significantly from amounts that we
estimate. To the extent the actual warranty expense differs from our estimates
by 10%, our 2021 net income would be higher or lower by approximately $0.2
million, on an after-tax basis, depending on whether the actual expense is lower
or higher, respectively, than the estimated provision.

Recent accounting pronouncements

Please see Note 2 “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” in Section 8 of this report for a discussion of these sections.

                                       40

————————————————– ——————————

Contents

© Edgar Online, source Previews

]]>
Indicator of the month: return on invested capital https://angil.org/indicator-of-the-month-return-on-invested-capital/ Wed, 02 Mar 2022 14:06:34 +0000 https://angil.org/indicator-of-the-month-return-on-invested-capital/ As countries begin to lift their pandemic restrictions and business leaders look to post-COVID-19 business models, it’s important to ask yourself if the investments you made in 2020 (or before) still have one direction. Repricing these investments can free up cash and enable investments in areas that generate long-term value. Perry D. Wiggins Return on […]]]>

As countries begin to lift their pandemic restrictions and business leaders look to post-COVID-19 business models, it’s important to ask yourself if the investments you made in 2020 (or before) still have one direction. Repricing these investments can free up cash and enable investments in areas that generate long-term value.

Perry D. Wiggins

Return on investment (ROIC) is a metric that brings clarity to these conversations. ROIC measures the amount of gain realized on the capital invested relative to the cost of the investment. The metric gives an organization the ability to track how well it is using its money to generate returns. Return on investment can be calculated by dividing an organization’s after-tax net operating income by the amount of capital invested and should be expressed as a percentage.

APQC finds that the top performers on this measure (those in the 75th percentile) see a return of 12.8% or more on their invested capital. That’s nearly double the return of underperformers (those in the 25th percentile), who see a 7% return on their invested capital.

These numbers represent a cross-industry view of APQC benchmarking data for ROI. It’s important to compare this metric within your industry, as ROI can vary significantly from industry to industry. Healthcare organizations such as hospitals have much lower profit margins and may not see as much return on invested capital compared to a software company. Regardless of the industry, a higher percentage is always better for this metric.

Increase return on investment

The primary way to improve ROI is to ensure that investments are aligned with the organization’s strategy. While this alignment should occur at least once a year during strategic planning, many organizations may need to revisit these conversations more frequently to account for the changing COVID-19 landscape.

For example, now is the time to rethink real estate footprints. If you have real estate-related investments but are moving towards a hybrid workforce model, you may be able to reduce those investments.

Performing well on ROIC means investing more efficiently. In some cases, this may mean spending more money up front on new software or equipment, rather than continuing to maintain older equipment that is rapidly becoming obsolete.

Investing more efficiently also means reducing certain investments. Plan thoroughly, thoughtfully, and collaboratively with your team to understand the investments you really need to generate a return, because every investment has a point of diminishing return. If your $10 million expansion can be an $8 million expansion and still get the same returns, you’ve just freed up money to invest elsewhere.

Once you’ve made investments, it can be difficult to isolate the returns. Some investments don’t pay off or don’t pay off right away. Investments in capital assets such as new equipment ultimately generate cost savings as these investments help prevent machine downtime and other problems. Customers won’t necessarily choose you over your competitor because you’ve just installed new self-service payment terminals. But they might choose your competitor over you if your self-checkout kiosks are down and customers have to wait in long lines. These investments are just as important as those that generate more visible returns.

An emerging post-pandemic business environment may require new investments or scale back older investments that no longer make sense. Review your investments with your team to ensure invested capital aligns with business strategy in 2022 and beyond.

Perry D. Wiggins, CPA, is chief financial officer, secretary, and treasurer of APQC, a nonprofit benchmarking and best practices research organization based in Houston, Texas.

]]>
Record Sales and Capital, Strategic Advancements Drive MassMutual’s Outstanding Growth and Performance in 2021 https://angil.org/record-sales-and-capital-strategic-advancements-drive-massmutuals-outstanding-growth-and-performance-in-2021/ Mon, 28 Feb 2022 13:30:00 +0000 https://angil.org/record-sales-and-capital-strategic-advancements-drive-massmutuals-outstanding-growth-and-performance-in-2021/ SPRINGFIELD, Mass.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (MassMutual) today announced strong financial results1 for 2021 – including record sales and capital levels that have reached an all-time high and strong operating income – while making significant progress on its long-term strategy and providing financial security to more Americans . With the pandemic prompting more people […]]]>

SPRINGFIELD, Mass.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (MassMutual) today announced strong financial results1 for 2021 – including record sales and capital levels that have reached an all-time high and strong operating income – while making significant progress on its long-term strategy and providing financial security to more Americans .

With the pandemic prompting more people to seek financial security for themselves and their loved ones, MassMutual has seen increased demand for its protection and planning solutions, strengthening the company’s position as a leading insurance provider. life. For the year ended December 31, 2021, sales of its core protection product, whole life insurance2, rose 25% to a record $767 million. Total individual life insurance sales rose 23% to $851 million, also an all-time high, bringing the total amount of insurance protection provided by the company to $895 billion.

These results, together with strong sales contributions from the company’s expanded product and business portfolio, strong market performance and sound business and expense management, helped drive operating profit at $2.1 billion. MassMutual also maintained its excellent financial strength and flexibility, with statutory surplus increasing 11% to $27 billion and total adjusted capital increasing 15% to $32.8 billion – both record highs. year-end – as the company continued to hold some of the highest ratings. any business in any industry.3

This enduring financial strength has enabled MassMutual to continue to deliver long-term value, paying out $7 billion in insurance and annuity benefits to its policyholders and customers. The company also approved an estimated record dividend payout of nearly $1.85 billion to eligible participating policyowners in 2022. This payout reflects a dividend interest rate of 6.00% and is the 16and consecutive year, MassMutual has paid a leading rate among its peer mutual companies.4

« 170 from MassMutualand It was one of the best years in our history as we delivered outstanding financial performance and made significant progress on our long-term growth strategy through another challenging year while helping more Americans achieve financial stability and security,” said Roger Crandall, Chairman of the Board. and CEO, MassMutual. “Our 2021 results reflect our financial strength and flexibility, our broad portfolio of holistic solutions, our ability to meet the needs and expectations of our customers, and most importantly, the hard work, dedication and resilience of our employees and professionals. of finance who are committed to helping more people secure their future and protect those they love.

Alongside strong 2021 results, MassMutual continued to take steps to grow and strengthen its key businesses and investments, one of the company’s most distinct competitive advantages that contributes to its goal of paying a competitive dividend. Especially, MassMutual acquired Great American Life Insurance Company to help expand its banking relationships and grow its range of lifetime income solutions. In 2021, Great American Life’s record annuity sales helped bring MassMutual’s total annuity sales to over $13 billion,5 position MassMutual to become one of the leading providers of individual annuities in the United States

MassMutual also continued to invest in solutions to improve the overall experience for customers and financial professionals, while evolving its culture with a focus on sustainability, inclusion and flexibility:

  • MassMutual continued to enhance its overall digital experience with the launch of Advisor360°, providing its finance professionals and their clients with instant, integrated access to client portfolios to aid in their financial planning. The company has also enhanced its end-to-end digital platform that allows it to introduce new products and issue insurance protection faster.

  • To create a stronger and more sustainable world for future generations, MassMutual net zero commitments established for its operations and its investment portfolio, while announcing a strategic investment in Low Carbona UK-based renewable energy investor and asset manager, to leverage proven technologies that are advancing renewable energy at scale.

  • Demonstrating its unwavering commitment to building a diverse, equitable, and inclusive organization and community, MassMutual began publicly sharing employee demographics and launched the MM Catalyst Funda $50 million fund to invest in various neglected Massachusetts entrepreneurs.

  • MassMutual continued to provide employees with additional time off and wellness programs to help manage COVID-19, and also introduced a new approach to day-to-day work that balances personal flexibility with in-person teamwork . And to provide employees with spaces that embrace the future of collaborative working, MassMutual has opened a new office building in Boston’s thriving Seaport district, allowing the company to tap into the best talent and resources from both ends. of the Commonwealth.

“Our outstanding performance in 2021 underscores MassMutual’s enduring financial strength and strong operating fundamentals, as well as the successful and continued execution of our strategy,” said Betsy Ward, Chief Financial Officer of MassMutual. “As we look to 2022, we remain focused on ensuring the business is well positioned to deliver long-term value to our policyholders – guided by our financial flexibility and stability, our term, our wide range of products and our commitment to mutuality.”

Capping MassMutual’s strong financial results in 2021, the company received several accolades for its strong reputation and continued commitment to fostering an inclusive and innovative workplace. MassMutual scored a perfect 100% on the Human Rights Campaign’s Business Equality Index as well as the Disability Equality Index,® earned the company the honor of being a Best Workplaces for LGBTQ+ Equality for the ninth consecutive year and Best Workplaces for Disability Inclusion for the fifth year. The company also ranked #123 on FORTUNE® 500 in 2021 and most recently was named FORTUNE’s Most Admired Company for the 21st weather in 2022,6 at the forefront of innovation in the life and health insurance industry.

For more information on MassMutual’s consolidated statutory financial results, visit: MassMutual Financial Summary Page.

1 These are the consolidated statutory results of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company and its US-domiciled life insurance subsidiaries: CM Life Insurance Company, MML Bay State Life Insurance Company and Great American Life Insurance Company.

2 Sales are classified as weighted sales, which are based on a weighted annualized new premium, with single premium payments weighted at 10%.

3 The financial strength ratings of MassMutual and its subsidiaries, CM Life Insurance Company and MML Bay State Life Insurance Company, are as follows: AM Best Company, A++ (Superior); Fitch Ratings, AA+ (very strong); Moody’s Investors Service, Aa3 (high quality); and S&P Global Ratings, AA+ (very strong). Ratings are current as of February 1, 2022 and are subject to change.

4 The dividend and dividend interest rate (DIR) are determined annually, subject to change and are not guaranteed. Dividends paid on qualifying participating life insurance policies consist primarily of investment, mortality and expense components. The DIR is used to determine the investment component of the dividend. It is not the rate of return of the policy and should not be the sole basis for comparison of insurers or policy performance.

5Annuity sales include Great American Life Insurance Company’s annuity sales of $2.4 billion in the first 5 months of 2021, before MassMutual acquired it.

6 Of Fortune. ©2021 FORTUNE Media IP Limited. All rights reserved. FORTUNE 500 (June 2021) and FORTUNE World’s Most Admired Company (February 2022) are trademarks of FORTUNE Media IP Limited and are used under license. FORTUNE and FORTUNE Media IP Limited are not affiliated with and do not endorse MassMutual’s products or services.

About MassMutual

MassMutual is a leading mutual life insurance company that is managed for the benefit of its members and participating policyholders. Founded in 1851, the company has always been driven by one constant goal: we help people secure their future and protect those they love. With a focus on long-term value creation, MassMutual offers a wide range of protection, accumulation, wealth management and retirement products and services. For more information, visit www.massmutual.com

]]>
Global banks ready for fuss as West hits Russia with sanctions https://angil.org/global-banks-ready-for-fuss-as-west-hits-russia-with-sanctions/ Wed, 23 Feb 2022 13:43:00 +0000 https://angil.org/global-banks-ready-for-fuss-as-west-hits-russia-with-sanctions/ Global banks are bracing for the ripple effects of tough new financial and economic sanctions on Russia designed to stifle its economy and restrict its access to foreign capital. On Tuesday, President Biden announced that the United States would impose sanctions on Russia’s main development bank, VEB, and its military bank, Promsvyazbank, and adopt comprehensive […]]]>

Global banks are bracing for the ripple effects of tough new financial and economic sanctions on Russia designed to stifle its economy and restrict its access to foreign capital.

On Tuesday, President Biden announced that the United States would impose sanctions on Russia’s main development bank, VEB, and its military bank, Promsvyazbank, and adopt comprehensive restrictions on Russian sovereign debt, cutting the country off from financing. western. He said the United States was also preparing to impose sanctions on Russian elites and their family members.

The sanctions will separate state-backed banks from the US financial system and make it harder for Russia to raise funds in foreign markets for major domestic infrastructure projects, which will most likely hamper growth. These actions were a taste of what awaits the Russian economy.

“We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia steps up,” Biden said.

On Tuesday, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson also imposed sanctions on several Russian banks and three Russian billionaires. And German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said he would end certification of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline which would increase energy imports from Russia.

The collective Western response is aimed at punishing Russia for stepping up its aggression against Ukraine. On Monday, Russia issued a decree sending troops to two regions of Ukraine, a decision widely interpreted in the West as a first step towards a full invasion.

Over the past decade, the United States has increasingly used sanctions to deal with diplomatic wrangling, including in North Korea and Iran. It was able to do this because the dollar is the world’s reserve currency and the most widely used for payments. However, the impact of sanctions is far from clear or precise. In the case of Russia, it is likely that much of the global financial system could also be affected due to the interconnected nature of global trade, although the impact is small.

Since 2014, when the United States imposed sanctions on Russia, after the annexation of Crimea by President Vladimir V. Putin, American and Western banks have withdrawn from direct transactions in the country. Yet the Biden administration’s sanctions could have far-reaching and indirect consequences, because Russia is a major exporter of commodities like natural gas and wheat, and it does business with companies and countries around the world. . As intermediaries, banks generally manage these transactions.

According to the Institute of International Finance, a trade association that represents global banks, tough economic sanctions could disrupt global trade flows if banks are forced to stop processing payments for goods and services in and out of Russia.

“The problem here is not just the immediate impact on financial markets, but the fact that it is almost impossible in the short term to disentangle” Russia from global trade, said Elina Ribakova, deputy chief economist of the institute, in an interview. “There is room for contagion.”

For example, if an American company wants to pay for Russian fertilizer using money from its American bank account, and the seller has an account with a Russian bank that is subject to sanctions, the American bank would not be able to process that payment, according to a banking sanctions expert who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Sanctions could also spread economic instability around the world by raising the prices of key commodities Russia produces – including oil, gas, fertilizer and palladium – and spur inflation in importing countries. these products, dealing another blow just as the world emerges from the pandemic.

The Russian economy could be relatively shielded from the full impact of the sanctions. Its external debt and ties with other advanced economies have declined since the 2014 Crimean crisis, insulating its economy from efforts to cut it off from the global financial system, economists at Capital Economics noted. They predicted that the most likely sanctions could reduce Russia’s gross domestic product by around 1%.

The country’s economy has long been dominated by domestic lenders, which only rose to prominence after the 2014 sanctions. European banks, including Raiffeisen Bank and UniCredit Bank, make up the bulk of the 6.3 % of assets held by foreign lenders in the Russian banking sector, while US banks hold less than 1%, according to the Institute of International Finance.

This limits the possibility of a systemic banking crisis spreading globally, but it will likely hamper Russia’s growth.

“Russia has a more insulated and isolated economy today than it did a decade ago,” Clay Lowery, executive vice president of the finance institute, said in a statement after Mr Biden’s announcement. . “This makes it less vulnerable to certain types of sanctions, but its growing economic isolationism is hurting the country’s long-term growth prospects,” he said.

Tuesday’s announcement follows weeks of preparation by administration officials, who weighed a series of economic sanctions. They included freezing the assets of Russian individuals and companies, banning trading in Russian sovereign bonds, and stopping the nation from using the dollar for payments.

The Biden administration has signaled that it has no plans to cut Russia off from Swift, a Belgian courier service that connects more than 11,000 financial institutions when transferring money around the world. Locking Russia out of Swift, officials said, would do too much damage to the global financial system and could also spur the growth of competing services.

Over the past few weeks, Biden administration officials have been in regular contact with banks about the possibility of economic sanctions against Russia, according to a banking official briefed on those discussions who spoke on condition of anonymity in due to the sensitivity of the situation. These talks aim to prepare lenders and minimize potential disruptions to financial markets if broader sanctions are put in place. They also covered how sanctions work and the potential impact on payment flows, according to another person briefed on the talks.

“The eyes of all major global financial institutions are on this situation,” said Daniel Tannebaum, a partner at Oliver Wyman who advises banks on sanctions.

While financial firms have less exposure to Russia than they did in 2014, the new sanctions are expected to impose much greater restrictions on transactions, Tannebaum said. Crimea-related sanctions have limited new financing for companies in certain Russian sectors, but have not completely blocked all transactions.

“It’s more like a sniper rifle,” he said of the Biden administration’s actions.

Investors, already nervous for weeks as tensions between Russia and Ukraine escalated, sold stocks on Tuesday. The S&P 500 fell more than 1% and the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index slid 0.1% for a decline of more than 3% in the past five days.

“Geopolitics has replaced Covid-19 as the primary concern for market fear,” said Paresh Upadhyaya, global bond portfolio manager at Amundi US, an asset manager. “Russian-Ukrainian tensions have the potential to dampen investor sentiment for weeks. The markets are waking up to the harsh reality of a two-headed monster of inflation and geopolitics.

Another threat to the global financial system is the danger of retaliatory cyberattacks from Russia – something US-based banks are on high alert for. The Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center, a group that shares intelligence in the financial industry, said it was looking for such threats.

The Treasury Department met with bank chiefs, including Brian Moynihan of Bank of America and Charles W. Scharf of Wells Fargo, last Wednesday for a previously scheduled meeting to discuss breach defenses. The next day, government officials from the White House and multiple agencies met with executives from major U.S. lenders to discuss their response to potential Russian hack threats, CNN reported.

On Tuesday, Mr Biden said the White House wanted to make sure Americans weren’t burdened with rising gas prices as energy markets are rocked by the developments. However, he said the United States was ready to impose tougher sanctions on Russia.

“Whatever Russia does next, we stand ready to respond with unity, clarity and conviction,” Biden said.

Adam M. Smith, a former Treasury Department official who is now a partner at the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, noted that the sanctions program has become more sophisticated over the past decade, giving the United States more leeway to target Russia without great fear of collateral damage and that international coordination had improved.

“The United States has gotten better at managing major economies and is doing a much better job of really getting everybody on board,” he said.

]]>